Ideesweet
10 mins agoIdeesweet
14 mins agoIdeesweet
19 mins agoIdeesweet
27 mins agoIdeesweet
31 mins agoIdeesweet
34 mins agoIdeesweet
41 mins agoIdeesweet
45 mins agoIdeesweet
47 mins agoIdeesweet
50 mins agoNdumo Mbuyazi
5 days agoMlistar Sa
4 days agoMlistar Sa
3 days agoGeelyfa
4 days agoBrandan
4 days agoIdeesweet
4 days agoIdeesweet
4 days agoIdeesweet
4 days agoIdeesweet
4 days agoIdeesweet
4 days agoIdeesweet
Just now agoIdeesweet
3 mins agoIdeesweet
10 mins agoIdeesweet
14 mins agoIdeesweet
19 mins agoIdeesweet
27 mins agoIdeesweet
31 mins agoIdeesweet
34 mins agoIdeesweet
41 mins agoIdeesweet
45 mins ago
Ideesweet
1 hr agoThe latest discussion around South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) cases has once again placed the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) under the spotlight, with former NPA head Shamila Batohi stressing that the institution remained committed to resolving these long-standing matters during her tenure.
Batohi explained that despite immense pressure from victims’ families and civil society, the NPA has continued to prioritise TRC-linked investigations, even as it struggled with limited resources, complex evidence gaps, and competing national priorities. The cases, which stem from apartheid-era human rights violations, often involve decades-old dockets, missing documentation, and witnesses who are no longer alive, making prosecutions exceptionally difficult.
According to updates shared in parliamentary briefings, dozens of TRC-related matters have been reopened, with specialised teams assigned to investigate unresolved crimes. However, progress has been slow, and expectations for swift convictions have often clashed with the realities of reconstructing historical cases built on fragile evidence.
While critics argue that justice has been delayed for too long, the NPA maintains that its approach is aimed at ensuring legally sound prosecutions rather than rushed outcomes. For many families of victims, though, every delay deepens the sense that justice remains unfinished.
The debate ultimately reflects a broader national question: how long should justice take when dealing with the unresolved wounds of history?