Ideesweet
45 mins agoIdeesweet
53 mins agoIdeesweet
58 mins agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
2 hrs agoIdeesweet
2 hrs agoMlistar Sa
6 days agoGeelyfa
6 days agoBrandan
6 days agoIdeesweet
45 mins agoIdeesweet
53 mins agoIdeesweet
58 mins agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
45 mins agoIdeesweet
53 mins agoIdeesweet
58 mins agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
2 hrs agoIdeesweet
2 hrs ago
Ideesweet
2 hrs agoSuspended City of Tshwane CFO, Gareth Mnisi, has firmly rejected allegations that he manipulated tender processes, telling the Madlanga Commission of Inquiry that his role was strictly oversight—not influence.
At the heart of the controversy is Mnisi’s position as chairperson of the Bid Adjudication Committee (BAC), a powerful body responsible for deciding which companies secure lucrative municipal contracts. Critics argue that such a role naturally carries influence, but Mnisi insists the committee operates collectively, guided by rules and compliance frameworks rather than individual agendas.
He further distanced himself from companies linked to the scandal, denying any personal or financial relationships with entities tied to major security tenders. His testimony paints a picture of a bureaucratic process driven by regulation—yet the broader investigation suggests deeper concerns about systemic vulnerabilities in procurement systems.
With disciplinary proceedings looming and public scrutiny intensifying, this case goes beyond one official. It raises a critical question: can oversight structures truly remain neutral in environments where power and contracts intersect?
As the inquiry unfolds, the outcome may redefine accountability in municipal governance—and determine whether Mnisi’s defense holds or collapses under pressure.