Ideesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoNdumo Mbuyazi
4 days agoMlistar Sa
3 days agoMlistar Sa
2 days agoGeelyfa
2 days agoBrandan
3 days agoIdeesweet
3 days agoIdeesweet
3 days agoIdeesweet
3 days agoIdeesweet
3 days agoIdeesweet
3 days agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr agoIdeesweet
1 hr ago
Ideesweet
6 hrs agoA dramatic courtroom session in the Western Cape High Court has heard serious allegations that have deepened the already controversial case involving alleged underworld figure Nafiz Modack and senior police officers Jeremy Vearey and Charl Kinnear.
Evidence presented to the court suggests Modack claimed he was approached through an alleged middleman and pressured into paying large sums of money, allegedly linked to efforts to influence the return of firearms seized during police operations. According to testimony, Modack believed the officers demanded payments in exchange for “favourable outcomes,” including the return of confiscated weapons.
However, the state argues a very different narrative: that Modack himself attempted to bribe the officers and later used those claims to justify a wider pattern of criminal conduct. Prosecutors have pointed to financial records showing payments routed through intermediaries but never reaching the officers directly.
The case also touches on broader allegations of corruption, intimidation, and a long-running gang-related conflict on the Cape Flats, where law enforcement and criminal networks are said to be deeply entangled.
Both Vearey and Kinnear have denied ever receiving any money, insisting they acted within lawful policing operations. The court continues to weigh conflicting testimonies in one of South Africa’s most closely watched corruption and organised crime trials.
As proceedings continue, the case raises deeper questions about trust in policing, the credibility of witnesses, and the blurred lines between crime-fighting and alleged corruption.